The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is set to achieve another milestone by infusing capital market studies (CMS) into schools curriculum with the signing of a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the Nigerian Educational Research and Development Council (NERDC).
This was done weekend at the Commission’s head office in Abuja in an effort to revive the collaboration between both organisations.
Speaking during the event, the Director General of SEC, Mounir Gwarzo said that the Commission has been in the vanguard of inculcating financial literacy for quite a long time because the SEC has realised that it is very important for students to imbibe the culture and habit of being financial literate and to be familiar with the operations of the capital market.
Gwarzo expressed enthusiasm that the collaboration will yield desired results as the MoU stated the different stages of implementation adding that the initiative is part of the implementation of the Capital Market Master Plan.
He expressed the belief that the MoU will galvanise the collaboration between the two parties for an effective implementation of the initiative.
The CMPP clearly states the need for the SEC to inculcate the culture of financial literacy and specifically to introduce Capital Market Studies into curriculum at all levels of education and to encourage CMS as a degree programme in the tertiary institutions.
In 2014, SEC developed a 10-year Capital Market Master Plan (CMMP) and one of the essential elements of the plan is the introduction of Capital Market Studies into schools curricula at all levels of education.
Towards giving effect to the foregoing, the SEC resolved to resuscitate its collaborative efforts with NERDC which dates back to 2003.
It would be recalled that in 2007, attempt by the SEC in collaboration with NERDC to develop and infuse CMS into six identified subjects did not see the light of the day.
In an effort to resuscitate the previous collaboration, the SEC noted that the success of the previous attempt was truncated due primarily to the absence of a working instrument to guide the implementation of the initiative.